One in three plant-based milks fails nutritional tests in Austria

A new study by SIPCAN has found that one in three plant-based milk alternatives in Austria fails to meet nutritional standards. The research assessed 444 products, focusing on sugar and fat levels across different types. Oat and almond options performed best, while coconut-based alternatives fell short in most cases.

The study analysed drinkable and spoonable milk alternatives, revealing a clear difference in quality. Nine out of ten beverages met SIPCAN's criteria, compared to just one in four thicker products.

Oat-based milks averaged 4.3 grams of sugar and 1.9 grams of fat per 100 millilitres. Almond versions contained even less, with 2.1 grams of sugar and 2.1 grams of fat. Both categories saw 85% of products passing the nutritional test. Coconut-based alternatives performed the worst, with only 12% meeting the standards. These products had the highest sugar and fat content, averaging 7.1 grams and 6.5 grams respectively.

The findings highlight a gap in nutritional quality among plant-based milks. Oat and almond options emerged as the healthiest choices, while coconut alternatives lagged behind. Consumers now have clearer data on which products align with dietary guidelines.